Anthropic vs Anthropic

Claude 4.6 Opus vs Claude 4.5 Haiku

Compare Claude 4.6 Opus and Claude 4.5 Haiku across pricing, context window, capabilities, benchmarks, and API access to choose the better fit for long-context workloads versus reasoning-heavy tasks.

Overview Comparison

Structured side-by-side differences for the highest-signal model metadata.

Claude 4.6 Opus
Claude 4.5 Haiku

Provider

The entity that currently provides this model.

Claude 4.6 Opus Anthropic
Claude 4.5 Haiku Anthropic

Model ID

The routed model identifier exposed by upstream providers.

Claude 4.6 Opus anthropic/claude-opus-4.6
Claude 4.5 Haiku anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5

Input Context Window

The number of tokens supported by the input context window.

Claude 4.6 Opus 1M tokens
Claude 4.5 Haiku 200,000 tokens

Maximum Output Tokens

The number of tokens that can be generated by the model in a single request.

Claude 4.6 Opus 128,000 tokens tokens
Claude 4.5 Haiku 64,000 tokens tokens

Open Source

Whether the model's code is available for public use.

Claude 4.6 Opus No
Claude 4.5 Haiku No

Release Date

When the model was first released.

Claude 4.6 Opus Feb 04, 2026
Claude 4.5 Haiku Oct 15, 2025

Knowledge Cut-off Date

When the model's knowledge was last updated.

Claude 4.6 Opus February 2026
Claude 4.5 Haiku 2025-02-28

API Providers

The providers that currently expose the model through an API.

Claude 4.6 Opus
OpenRouter
Claude 4.5 Haiku
Vertex AI

Modalities

Types of data each model can process or return.

Claude 4.6 Opus
Text Image File
Claude 4.5 Haiku
Text Image File

Pricing Comparison

Compare current token pricing before you choose the cheaper or more scalable API option.

Claude 4.6 Opus Anthropic
Input price $5.00 Per 1M tokens
Output price $25.00 Per 1M tokens
Claude 4.5 Haiku Anthropic
Input price $1.00 Per 1M tokens
Output price $5.00 Per 1M tokens

Capabilities Comparison

See where each model overlaps, where they differ, and which one supports more of the features you care about.

Capability
Claude 4.6 Opus
Claude 4.5 Haiku
Adaptive Thinking Automatically adjusts the amount of reasoning effort applied based on task complexity, allocating deeper computation to harder problems and less to simpler ones.
Claude 4.6 Opus Supported
Claude 4.5 Haiku
Agentic Coding Handles long-horizon software development tasks including architecture, implementation, and deployment, with benchmark results on Terminal-Bench 2.0 cited in the model overview.
Claude 4.6 Opus Supported
Claude 4.5 Haiku
Agentic Web Search Performs deep, multi-step web research to locate hard-to-find information, with BrowseComp cited as a benchmark for this capability in the model overview.
Claude 4.6 Opus Supported
Claude 4.5 Haiku
Built-in Reasoning Includes a reasoning mode that allows the model to work through complex problems step by step before producing a final answer.
Claude 4.6 Opus
Claude 4.5 Haiku Supported
Coding Performance Delivers strong results on coding tasks, producing code generation and debugging outputs comparable to heavier models at lower cost and higher speed.
Claude 4.6 Opus
Claude 4.5 Haiku Supported
Complex Reasoning Applies multi-step reasoning across rigorous multidisciplinary tasks, with performance on Humanity's Last Exam cited as a benchmark reference in the model overview.
Claude 4.6 Opus Supported
Claude 4.5 Haiku
Extended Output Generates up to 64,000 tokens in a single response, supporting long-form code generation, detailed reports, and multi-step outputs.
Claude 4.6 Opus
Claude 4.5 Haiku Supported
File
Claude 4.6 Opus Supported
Claude 4.5 Haiku Supported
High Throughput Speed Optimized for low-latency responses, making it suitable for real-time applications such as live coding assistants and customer support bots.
Claude 4.6 Opus
Claude 4.5 Haiku Supported
Image
Claude 4.6 Opus Supported
Claude 4.5 Haiku Supported
Large Context Window Processes up to 1 million tokens in a single session (currently in beta), enabling analysis of entire codebases, lengthy documents, or large data sets without truncation.
Claude 4.6 Opus Supported
Claude 4.5 Haiku Supported
MCP Server Support Connects to Model Context Protocol servers, allowing the model to interact with external data sources and services through a standardized interface.
Claude 4.6 Opus Supported
Claude 4.5 Haiku
Multimodal Input Accepts text, images, and PDFs as input, allowing document analysis and vision-based tasks within the same model.
Claude 4.6 Opus
Claude 4.5 Haiku Supported
Professional Knowledge Work Handles economically valuable tasks in domains such as finance and legal analysis, with GDPval-AA cited as a benchmark evaluation in the model overview.
Claude 4.6 Opus Supported
Claude 4.5 Haiku
Reasoning
Claude 4.6 Opus Supported
Claude 4.5 Haiku Supported
Structured Output
Claude 4.6 Opus Supported
Claude 4.5 Haiku Supported
Subagent Orchestration Can coordinate and manage teams of subagents, parallelizing work across tools to complete complex, multi-stage tasks with minimal human intervention.
Claude 4.6 Opus Supported
Claude 4.5 Haiku
Text
Claude 4.6 Opus Supported
Claude 4.5 Haiku Supported
Tool Calling & Agents Supports tool calling and multi-step workflow automation, enabling integration into agentic pipelines that require external API calls or sequential reasoning.
Claude 4.6 Opus
Claude 4.5 Haiku Supported
Tool Use Accepts tool definitions at inference time and can call external functions or APIs, enabling integration with custom workflows and automated pipelines.
Claude 4.6 Opus Supported
Claude 4.5 Haiku
Tools
Claude 4.6 Opus Supported
Claude 4.5 Haiku Supported

Benchmark Comparison

Shared benchmark rows make it easier to compare performance where both models have published scores.

Benchmark Claude 4.6 Opus Claude 4.5 Haiku
ARC-AGI-2
Novel abstract reasoning and pattern recognition
Claude 4.6 Opus 68.8%
Claude 4.5 Haiku N/A
BigLaw Bench
Legal reasoning and analysis tasks
Claude 4.6 Opus 90.2%
Claude 4.5 Haiku N/A
GPQA Diamond
PhD-level science questions (biology, physics, chemistry)
Claude 4.6 Opus 84.0%
Claude 4.5 Haiku 64.6%
HLE
Questions that challenge frontier models across many domains
Claude 4.6 Opus 18.6%
Claude 4.5 Haiku 4.3%
LiveCodeBench
Real-world coding tasks from recent competitions
Claude 4.6 Opus N/A
Claude 4.5 Haiku 51.1%
MMLU-Pro
Expert knowledge across 14 academic disciplines
Claude 4.6 Opus N/A
Claude 4.5 Haiku 80.0%
SciCode
Scientific research coding and numerical methods
Claude 4.6 Opus 45.7%
Claude 4.5 Haiku 34.4%
SWE-bench Verified
Real GitHub issues requiring multi-file code fixes
Claude 4.6 Opus 80.8%
Claude 4.5 Haiku N/A
Terminal-Bench 2.0
Agentic coding and terminal command tasks
Claude 4.6 Opus 65.4%
Claude 4.5 Haiku N/A
Community discussion

What Reddit discussions say about Claude 4.6 Opus vs Claude 4.5 Haiku

Claude 4.6 Opus and Claude 4.5 Haiku are both surfacing live Reddit discussions, giving this comparison a community layer beyond specs and benchmarks.

The most visible threads right now are clustered in r/LocalLLaMA, r/perplexity_ai, r/cursor.

Claude 4.5 Haiku r/perplexity_ai 1,237 upvotes 288 comments November 5, 2025
Perplexity is DELIBERATELY SCAMMING AND REROUTING users to other models

As you can see in the graph above, while in October, the use of Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking was normal, since the 1st of November, Perplexity has deliberately rerouted most if not ALL Sonnet 4.5 and 4.5 Thinking messages to far worse quality models like Gemini 2 Flash and, interestingly, Claude 4.5 Haiku Thinking which are probably cheaper models.

Perplexity is essentially SCAMMING subscribers by marketing their model as "Sonnet 4.5 Thinking" but then having all prompts given by a different model--still a Claude one so we don't realise!

Very scummy.

Open Reddit thread
Claude 4.6 Opus r/cursor 329 upvotes 83 comments April 9, 2026
How I use Cursor 10+ hours a day without torching my Claude Opus 4.6 limits

Anyone else here doing full-stack Next.js in Cursor and watching the Claude quota evaporate before lunch? I used to be in the same boat — massive context windows from all the components, pages, and DB logic would smoke the default limits fast.
Not anymore. I’ve been on this setup for weeks and basically never hit a wall while still getting top-tier answers. Here’s exactly what I do:

**1. .cursorrules is non-negotiable**
I keep one in the root of every project. The key line I added: “Never explain the code to me. Just output the code blocks.”
That single rule saves me thousands of output tokens a day. No more walls of “here’s what I changed and why” — just the goods.

**2. Stopped using Cursor’s built-in Claude quota**
I killed the default Cursor Pro subscription for the heavy stuff. Instead I use my own API keys and point Cursor’s “OpenAI Compatible” base URL at LLM Router Gateway.
Inside [llmrouter](https://llmrouter.app/) routing settings I set up simple tags routing like this:

* **UI & CSS tweaks**: gemini-3.1-flash → gpt-5.4-mini
* **Deep backend / complex logic**: claude-opus-4.6 → deepseek-v3.2
* **General / quick questions**: llama-4-scout

I sorted the fallback chains by speed vs intelligence. The router auto-detects the query type, so 90% of my UI polish and small fixes go to Gemini (basically free + huge context). I only actually hit Claude Opus 4.6 when I’m doing nasty database refactors or tricky architecture stuff. My Anthropic bill dropped \~70% overnight.

**3. Cmd+K for everything small**
Don’t open the full chat sidebar just to rename a variable or extract a component. Highlight the code, hit Cmd+K, let a fast model handle the inline edit. Saves a ton of tokens and feels way snappier.
That’s it. Super simple but it completely changed how much I can actually use Cursor in a day.

How are you all managing the limits? Using a Cursor Team? Or did you build your own router hacks too? Drop your setups — always looking to steal better ideas.

Open Reddit thread
Claude 4.6 Opus r/LocalLLaMA 272 upvotes 123 comments April 14, 2026
These "Claude-4.6-Opus" Fine Tunes of Local Models Are Usually A Downgrade

Time and time again I find posts about these fine tunes that promise increased intelligence and reasoning with base models, and I continuously try them, realize they're botched, and delete them shortly after. I sometimes do resort to a lower quant since they are bigger, in this case, a 40b variant of Qwen 3.5 27b, but they seem to always let me down. I've resorted to not downloading any model with "Claude Opus 4.6" in the name.

Kudos to everyone who tries to make the foundation models more intelligent, but imo, it never works.

Note that this example is anecdotal evidence on a single prompt, but it's overall always the case of decreased intelligence when using with a local agent setup + llama.cpp in WSL2. This is irrespective of the quant as well - I've tried many.

One thing to notice however, the reasoning/thinking is significantly less, perhaps that's part of the problem.

Have any you found these better than base, ever?

The attached screenshots are:

./llama-server -hf mradermacher/Qwen3.5-27B-heretic-GGUF:Q4_K_S --temp 1.0 --top-p 0.8 --top-k 20 --min-p 0.00 --fit on --alias default --jinja --flash-attn on --ctx-size 262144 --ctx-checkpoints 256 --cache-ram -1 --cache-type-k q4_0 --cache-type-v q4_0 --threads 8 --threads-batch 16 --no-mmap

./llama-server -hf mradermacher/Qwen3.5-40B-Claude-4.6-Opus-Deckard-Heretic-Uncensored-Thinking-i1-GGUF:i1-Q3_K_S --temp 1.0 --top-p 0.8 --top-k 20 --min-p 0.00 --fit on --alias default --jinja --flash-attn on --ctx-size 131072 --ctx-checkpoints 256 --cache-ram -1 --cache-type-k q4_0 --cache-type-v q4_0 --threads 8 --threads-batch 16 --no-mmap

Open Reddit thread
Claude 4.6 Opus r/LocalLLaMA 207 upvotes 77 comments March 18, 2026
Let's GO ! Qwen3.5-Claude-4.6-Opus-Reasoning-Distilled-v2

Also waiting for 27B ? :D

[https://huggingface.co/collections/Jackrong/qwen35-claude-46-opus-reasoning-distilled-v2](https://huggingface.co/collections/Jackrong/qwen35-claude-46-opus-reasoning-distilled-v2)

UPDATE:
Well after some testing, for a small hobby project i found B27 Q6 very capable for local inference in opencode together with [https://github.com/code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent](https://github.com/code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent)

Open Reddit thread

Anthropic just dropped Haiku 4.5 and the numbers are wild:

**Performance:**

* 73.3% on SWE-bench Verified (matches Sonnet 4 from 5 months ago)
* 90% of Sonnet 4.5's agentic coding performance
* 2x faster than Sonnet 4
* 4-5x faster than Sonnet 4.5

**Pricing:**

* $1 input / $5 output per million tokens
* That's 66% cheaper than Sonnet 4 ($3/$15)
* \~10x cheaper than Sonnet 4.5 for 90% of the performance

**Why this matters:**

Multi-agent systems are now economically viable. Before Haiku 4.5:

* 10 agents × $15/million = $150/million (too expensive)
* 10 agents × 10s latency = 100s total (too slow)

With Haiku 4.5:

* 10 agents × $5/million = $50/million (3x cheaper)
* 10 agents × 2s latency = 20s total (5x faster)

**Use cases unlocked:**

* Real-time chat assistants (2s response time)
* Automated code reviews (\~$0.01 per review)
* Pair programming with Claude Code (no latency friction)
* Rapid prototyping (iterate as much as you want)

**Available now:**

* Claude.ai
* Claude Code (CLI + extension) - use `/model` command
* API: `model="claude-haiku-4.5-20251015"`
* AWS Bedrock
* Google Cloud Vertex AI

We wrote a deep-dive article (in French, but code examples and benchmarks are universal) with cost analysis, migration guides, and real scenarios: [here](https://cc-france.org/blog/claude-haiku-45-le-modle-qui-redfinit-le-rapport-p)

The barrier between "proof of concept" and "production" just got dramatically lower.

What are you planning to build with it?

Open Reddit thread
Claude 4.5 Haiku r/windsurf 66 upvotes 15 comments March 11, 2026
PSA: Windsurf has free Claude 4.5 Haiku, Sonnet, Opus; GPT 5-1

Press CTRL+I to invoke Windsurf Command ([documentation)](https://docs.windsurf.com/command/windsurf-overview): this generates code at your cursor, or it edits blocks of text. It never uses any credits.

Also, GPT 5.1 Codex and 5.1 Codex Mini are free in Cascade / chat ([documentation](https://docs.windsurf.com/windsurf/models)).

Open Reddit thread
View more discussions →

AI tools related to Claude 4.6 Opus vs Claude 4.5 Haiku

These tools are closely connected to one or both models in this comparison and can help you evaluate real-world fit.

AI Chatbot

LongShot AI

LongShot AI is an AI-powered content creation platform built to help users plan, generate, and optimize articles for search engines like Google, ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini. It provides features such as real-time content generation, fact-checking, semantic SEO, and custom AI tools to produce high-quality, SEO-optimized content. LongShot AI balances creativity with optimization to help users create content that engages audiences and improves search rankings.

Free 0 visits 30 saves
AI Chatbot

Claudeai.ai

Claudeai.ai is a platform powered by Anthropic's Claude 2 language model. It provides global access to Claude 2's features, including support for processing various text files, a 100K token context limit, and the ability to interact with up to 5 files at once. While not affiliated with Anthropic, Claudeai.ai uses the Claude 2 API to offer a user experience similar to the official website, accessible without regional restrictions.

Free 0 visits 17 saves
AI Writing Assistants

Sudowrite

Sudowrite is an AI writing assistant tailored for fiction authors, novelists, and screenwriters. It helps users overcome writer's block, brainstorm concepts, generate prose, expand scenes, refine sentences, and receive feedback on drafts. By utilizing various large language models, it supports the entire writing process—from initial outlining to final editing—to make writing more efficient, enjoyable, and collaborative.

Free 1 visits 17 saves
AI Agent

Engine

Engine is a suite of LLM-powered no-code tools that enables the creation of hosted API endpoints, HTML pages, and images using natural language. Additionally, it functions as an AI software engineer for teams, integrating with platforms like Jira, Trello, and Linear to convert tickets into pull requests, helping to automate development tasks and clear backlogs.

Free 0 visits 6 saves

Which model should you choose?

Use the summary below to decide which model better fits your workflow, budget, and feature requirements.

Best fit for

Claude 4.6 Opus

Claude 4.6 Opus is a stronger fit for long-context workloads, reasoning-heavy tasks, tool-augmented workflows.

Best fit for

Claude 4.5 Haiku

Claude 4.5 Haiku is a stronger fit for reasoning-heavy tasks, tool-augmented workflows, multimodal applications.

Verdict

Choose Claude 4.6 Opus if you prioritize long-context workloads, reasoning-heavy tasks, tool-augmented workflows. Choose Claude 4.5 Haiku if your workflow depends more on reasoning-heavy tasks, tool-augmented workflows, multimodal applications.

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 4.6 Opus vs Claude 4.5 Haiku

What is the main difference between Claude 4.6 Opus and Claude 4.5 Haiku?

Claude 4.6 Opus leans toward long-context workloads, reasoning-heavy tasks, tool-augmented workflows, while Claude 4.5 Haiku is better suited to reasoning-heavy tasks, tool-augmented workflows, multimodal applications.

Which model is cheaper: Claude 4.6 Opus or Claude 4.5 Haiku?

Claude 4.5 Haiku starts lower on input pricing at $1.0000 per 1M input tokens, compared with $5.0000 for Claude 4.6 Opus.

Which model has the larger context window: Claude 4.6 Opus or Claude 4.5 Haiku?

Claude 4.6 Opus is listed with a context window of 1M, while Claude 4.5 Haiku is listed with 200,000.

How should I evaluate Claude 4.6 Opus vs Claude 4.5 Haiku for my use case?

This comparison currently includes 9 shared benchmark rows, helping you compare practical performance across overlapping evaluations.