Reasoning Controls
OpenRouter lists GPT-5.5 with reasoning support and explicit reasoning-related request parameters.
Opus 4.7 is the next generation of Anthropic's Opus family, built for long-running, asynchronous agents. Building on the coding and agentic strengths of Opus 4.6, it delivers stronger performance on...
High-signal model metadata in a structured two-column overview table.
The entity that provides this model.
The routed model identifier exposed by upstream providers.
The number of tokens supported by the input context window.
The number of tokens that can be generated by the model in a single request.
Whether the model's code is available for public use.
When the model was first released.
When the model's knowledge was last updated.
The providers that offer this model. This is not an exhaustive list.
Types of data this model can process.
A fuller summary of positioning, capabilities, and source-specific details for Claude 4.7 Opus.
Opus 4.7 is the next generation of Anthropic's Opus family, built for long-running, asynchronous agents. Building on the coding and agentic strengths of Opus 4.6, it delivers stronger performance on...
OpenRouter lists GPT-5.5 with reasoning support and explicit reasoning-related request parameters.
Structured output settings are exposed through OpenRouter for schema-driven or format-controlled responses.
Tool invocation and tool selection are supported in the routed OpenRouter interface for this model.
This model accepts text input, image input, file input and returns text output.
OpenRouter currently lists a context window of 1M with up to 128,000 tokens maximum output tokens.
Primary API pricing shown in the same “quick compare” spirit as the reference page.
Additional usage-cost dimensions synced into the project for this model.
Places where this model is available, based on the synced detail-page metadata.
Endpoint-level provider data currently available for this model.
The configurable options currently documented for this model.
When enabled, the model will explain its thought process step-by-step before providing a final answer. This can help users understand how the model arrived at its conclusions, but may result in longer responses. Opus 4.7 uses adaptive thinking mode. The model dynamically decides when and how much to think.
Controls how much the model thinks vs. how quickly it responds. Higher effort produces better quality but uses more tokens and is slower. Recommended: High or Extra High for coding and agentic work; Medium for general use; Low for short, latency-sensitive tasks. Only applies when Reasoning is enabled.
Parameters currently listed by OpenRouter or the local catalog for this model.
Official model cards, release notes, docs, and other references synced from the source page.
Jump straight into the most relevant side-by-side comparison pages for this model.
Compare Claude 4.7 Opus and Claude 4 Sonnet across pricing, context window, capabilities, benchmarks, and API access to choose the better fit for long-context workloads versus reasoning-heavy tasks.
Compare Claude 4.7 Opus and Claude 4 Opus across pricing, context window, capabilities, benchmarks, and API access to choose the better fit for long-context workloads versus reasoning-heavy tasks.
Compare Claude 4.8 Opus and Claude 4.7 Opus across pricing, context window, capabilities, benchmarks, and API access to choose the better fit for reasoning-heavy tasks versus long-context workloads.
Compare Claude 4.7 Opus and Claude 4.6 Sonnet across pricing, context window, capabilities, benchmarks, and API access to choose the better fit for long-context workloads versus long-context workloads.
Compare Claude 4.7 Opus and Claude 4.6 Opus across pricing, context window, capabilities, benchmarks, and API access to choose the better fit for long-context workloads versus long-context workloads.
Compare Claude 4.7 Opus and Claude 4.5 Sonnet across pricing, context window, capabilities, benchmarks, and API access to choose the better fit for long-context workloads versus reasoning-heavy tasks.
Claude 4.7 Opus discussions are most active in r/QualityAssurance. The strongest match in this snapshot has 49 upvotes and 28 comments.
I’m currently working as an SDET in a product-based company, mainly focused on end-to-end automation testing. Recently, I came across discussions saying many companies no longer prefer QA engineers who only have E2E automation experience, and it honestly made me anxious about my long-term career prospects.
A lot of my work involves:
* E2E automation frameworks
* API testing
* CI/CD deployments in test env
* Test infrastructure and automation pipelines
For experienced engineers/managers here:
* How do you see the future of SDET/QA roles evolving?
* Is deep E2E automation experience still valuable long term?
* What skills should someone in QA automation start building now to stay relevant in the next 5–10 years?
* Would you recommend transitioning toward backend development, infrastructure/platform engineering, or something else?
Thanks in advance (used gpt to format/modify it)
Continue browsing adjacent models from the same provider.