Claude 4.6 Sonnet vs Claude 4.5 Haiku
Compare Claude 4.6 Sonnet and Claude 4.5 Haiku across pricing, context window, capabilities, benchmarks, and API access to choose the better fit for long-context workloads versus reasoning-heavy tasks.
Overview Comparison
Structured side-by-side differences for the highest-signal model metadata.
Provider
The entity that currently provides this model.
Model ID
The routed model identifier exposed by upstream providers.
Input Context Window
The number of tokens supported by the input context window.
Maximum Output Tokens
The number of tokens that can be generated by the model in a single request.
Open Source
Whether the model's code is available for public use.
Release Date
When the model was first released.
Knowledge Cut-off Date
When the model's knowledge was last updated.
API Providers
The providers that currently expose the model through an API.
Modalities
Types of data each model can process or return.
Pricing Comparison
Compare current token pricing before you choose the cheaper or more scalable API option.
Capabilities Comparison
See where each model overlaps, where they differ, and which one supports more of the features you care about.
Benchmark Comparison
Shared benchmark rows make it easier to compare performance where both models have published scores.
| Benchmark | Claude 4.6 Sonnet | Claude 4.5 Haiku |
|---|---|---|
|
ARC-AGI-2
Novel abstract reasoning and pattern recognition
|
||
|
Finance Agent
Financial analysis and decision-making tasks
|
||
|
GPQA Diamond
PhD-level science questions (biology, physics, chemistry)
|
||
|
HLE
Questions that challenge frontier models across many domains
|
||
|
IFBench
Instruction following accuracy
|
||
|
LiveCodeBench
Real-world coding tasks from recent competitions
|
||
|
Long Context Reasoning
Reasoning across long documents and contexts
|
||
|
MATH-500
Undergraduate and competition-level math problems
|
||
|
MCP-Atlas Tool Use
Structured tool use via Model Context Protocol
|
||
|
MMLU-Pro
Expert knowledge across 14 academic disciplines
|
||
|
MMMB
Multilingual and multimodal understanding
|
||
|
OSWorld-Verified
Autonomous computer use and desktop tasks
|
||
|
SciCode
Scientific research coding and numerical methods
|
||
|
SWE-bench Verified
Real GitHub issues requiring multi-file code fixes
|
||
|
Terminal-Bench 2.0
Agentic coding and terminal command tasks
|
||
|
TerminalBench Hard
Agentic coding and terminal command tasks
|
||
|
τ²-Bench
Agentic tool use in realistic scenarios
|
||
|
τ²-bench Retail
Agentic tool use in retail scenarios
|
||
|
τ²-bench Telecom
Agentic tool use in telecom scenarios
|
What Reddit discussions say about Claude 4.6 Sonnet vs Claude 4.5 Haiku
Claude 4.6 Sonnet and Claude 4.5 Haiku are both surfacing live Reddit discussions, giving this comparison a community layer beyond specs and benchmarks.
The most visible threads right now are clustered in r/SillyTavernAI, r/perplexity_ai, r/DeepSeek.
As you can see in the graph above, while in October, the use of Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking was normal, since the 1st of November, Perplexity has deliberately rerouted most if not ALL Sonnet 4.5 and 4.5 Thinking messages to far worse quality models like Gemini 2 Flash and, interestingly, Claude 4.5 Haiku Thinking which are probably cheaper models.
Perplexity is essentially SCAMMING subscribers by marketing their model as "Sonnet 4.5 Thinking" but then having all prompts given by a different model--still a Claude one so we don't realise!
Very scummy.
Honestly, it isn't a terrible model.
I would put it on par with maybe Claude 4.6 sonnet.
For creativity, as I usually need that for writing. Its pretty excellent. Just not the feeling of a model like opus would.
I don't really use any other model except Kimi K2.6, as that's the best one so far.
For coding, it's pretty good too, though I've only done some html stuff with it.
And the fact it's in preview, just only means there's a hole lot more this model can do! Once it gets better at roleplay (still a bit generic, better than deepseek V3.2 in some way imo). It would be my daily driver most definitely.
[https://openrouter.ai/anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6](https://openrouter.ai/anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6)
Same price as Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic just dropped Haiku 4.5 and the numbers are wild:
**Performance:**
* 73.3% on SWE-bench Verified (matches Sonnet 4 from 5 months ago)
* 90% of Sonnet 4.5's agentic coding performance
* 2x faster than Sonnet 4
* 4-5x faster than Sonnet 4.5
**Pricing:**
* $1 input / $5 output per million tokens
* That's 66% cheaper than Sonnet 4 ($3/$15)
* \~10x cheaper than Sonnet 4.5 for 90% of the performance
**Why this matters:**
Multi-agent systems are now economically viable. Before Haiku 4.5:
* 10 agents × $15/million = $150/million (too expensive)
* 10 agents × 10s latency = 100s total (too slow)
With Haiku 4.5:
* 10 agents × $5/million = $50/million (3x cheaper)
* 10 agents × 2s latency = 20s total (5x faster)
**Use cases unlocked:**
* Real-time chat assistants (2s response time)
* Automated code reviews (\~$0.01 per review)
* Pair programming with Claude Code (no latency friction)
* Rapid prototyping (iterate as much as you want)
**Available now:**
* Claude.ai
* Claude Code (CLI + extension) - use `/model` command
* API: `model="claude-haiku-4.5-20251015"`
* AWS Bedrock
* Google Cloud Vertex AI
We wrote a deep-dive article (in French, but code examples and benchmarks are universal) with cost analysis, migration guides, and real scenarios: [here](https://cc-france.org/blog/claude-haiku-45-le-modle-qui-redfinit-le-rapport-p)
The barrier between "proof of concept" and "production" just got dramatically lower.
What are you planning to build with it?
Press CTRL+I to invoke Windsurf Command ([documentation)](https://docs.windsurf.com/command/windsurf-overview): this generates code at your cursor, or it edits blocks of text. It never uses any credits.
Also, GPT 5.1 Codex and 5.1 Codex Mini are free in Cascade / chat ([documentation](https://docs.windsurf.com/windsurf/models)).
Anthropic just dropped Haiku 4.5 and the numbers are wild:
**Performance:**
* 73.3% on SWE-bench Verified (matches Sonnet 4 from 5 months ago)
* 90% of Sonnet 4.5's agentic coding performance
* 2x faster than Sonnet 4
* 4-5x faster than Sonnet 4.5
**Pricing:**
* $1 input / $5 output per million tokens
* That's 66% cheaper than Sonnet 4 ($3/$15)
* \~10x cheaper than Sonnet 4.5 for 90% of the performance
**Why this matters:**
Multi-agent systems are now economically viable. Before Haiku 4.5:
* 10 agents × $15/million = $150/million (too expensive)
* 10 agents × 10s latency = 100s total (too slow)
With Haiku 4.5:
* 10 agents × $5/million = $50/million (3x cheaper)
* 10 agents × 2s latency = 20s total (5x faster)
**Use cases unlocked:**
* Real-time chat assistants (2s response time)
* Automated code reviews (\~$0.01 per review)
* Pair programming with Claude Code (no latency friction)
* Rapid prototyping (iterate as much as you want)
**Available now:**
* [Claude.ai](http://Claude.ai)
* Claude Code (CLI + extension) - use `/model` command
* API: `model="claude-haiku-4.5-20251015"`
* AWS Bedrock
* Google Cloud Vertex AI
We wrote a deep-dive article (in French, but code examples and benchmarks are universal) with cost analysis, migration guides, and real scenarios: [here](https://cc-france.org/blog/claude-haiku-45-le-modle-qui-redfinit-le-rapport-p)
The barrier between "proof of concept" and "production" just got dramatically lower.
What are you planning to build with it?
Which model should you choose?
Use the summary below to decide which model better fits your workflow, budget, and feature requirements.
Claude 4.6 Sonnet
Claude 4.6 Sonnet is a stronger fit for long-context workloads, reasoning-heavy tasks, tool-augmented workflows.
Claude 4.5 Haiku
Claude 4.5 Haiku is a stronger fit for reasoning-heavy tasks, tool-augmented workflows, multimodal applications.
Choose Claude 4.6 Sonnet if you prioritize long-context workloads, reasoning-heavy tasks, tool-augmented workflows. Choose Claude 4.5 Haiku if your workflow depends more on reasoning-heavy tasks, tool-augmented workflows, multimodal applications.
Common questions about Claude 4.6 Sonnet vs Claude 4.5 Haiku
What is the main difference between Claude 4.6 Sonnet and Claude 4.5 Haiku?
Claude 4.6 Sonnet leans toward long-context workloads, reasoning-heavy tasks, tool-augmented workflows, while Claude 4.5 Haiku is better suited to reasoning-heavy tasks, tool-augmented workflows, multimodal applications.
Which model is cheaper: Claude 4.6 Sonnet or Claude 4.5 Haiku?
Claude 4.5 Haiku starts lower on input pricing at $1.0000 per 1M input tokens, compared with $3.0000 for Claude 4.6 Sonnet.
Which model has the larger context window: Claude 4.6 Sonnet or Claude 4.5 Haiku?
Claude 4.6 Sonnet is listed with a context window of 1M, while Claude 4.5 Haiku is listed with 200,000.
How should I evaluate Claude 4.6 Sonnet vs Claude 4.5 Haiku for my use case?
This comparison currently includes 19 shared benchmark rows, helping you compare practical performance across overlapping evaluations.