Anthropic vs Anthropic

Claude 4.6 Sonnet vs Claude 4.5 Haiku

Compare Claude 4.6 Sonnet and Claude 4.5 Haiku across pricing, context window, capabilities, benchmarks, and API access to choose the better fit for long-context workloads versus reasoning-heavy tasks.

Overview Comparison

Structured side-by-side differences for the highest-signal model metadata.

Claude 4.6 Sonnet
Claude 4.5 Haiku

Provider

The entity that currently provides this model.

Claude 4.6 Sonnet Anthropic
Claude 4.5 Haiku Anthropic

Model ID

The routed model identifier exposed by upstream providers.

Claude 4.6 Sonnet anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6
Claude 4.5 Haiku anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5

Input Context Window

The number of tokens supported by the input context window.

Claude 4.6 Sonnet 1M tokens
Claude 4.5 Haiku 200,000 tokens

Maximum Output Tokens

The number of tokens that can be generated by the model in a single request.

Claude 4.6 Sonnet 128,000 tokens tokens
Claude 4.5 Haiku 64,000 tokens tokens

Open Source

Whether the model's code is available for public use.

Claude 4.6 Sonnet No
Claude 4.5 Haiku No

Release Date

When the model was first released.

Claude 4.6 Sonnet Feb 17, 2026
Claude 4.5 Haiku Oct 15, 2025

Knowledge Cut-off Date

When the model's knowledge was last updated.

Claude 4.6 Sonnet February 2026
Claude 4.5 Haiku 2025-02-28

API Providers

The providers that currently expose the model through an API.

Claude 4.6 Sonnet
OpenRouter
Claude 4.5 Haiku
Vertex AI

Modalities

Types of data each model can process or return.

Claude 4.6 Sonnet
Text Image File Code
Claude 4.5 Haiku
Text Image File

Pricing Comparison

Compare current token pricing before you choose the cheaper or more scalable API option.

Claude 4.6 Sonnet Anthropic
Input price $3.00 Per 1M tokens
Output price $15.00 Per 1M tokens
Claude 4.5 Haiku Anthropic
Input price $1.00 Per 1M tokens
Output price $5.00 Per 1M tokens

Capabilities Comparison

See where each model overlaps, where they differ, and which one supports more of the features you care about.

Capability
Claude 4.6 Sonnet
Claude 4.5 Haiku
1M Token Context Accepts up to 1 million tokens in a single request (beta), enabling reasoning across entire codebases, lengthy contracts, or dozens of documents at once.
Claude 4.6 Sonnet Supported
Claude 4.5 Haiku
Advanced Coding Supports the full software development lifecycle including planning, implementation, debugging, and large-scale refactors across multiple files.
Claude 4.6 Sonnet Supported
Claude 4.5 Haiku
Agentic Workflows Handles long-running, multi-step autonomous tasks with improved instruction following, tool selection, and error correction over extended sessions.
Claude 4.6 Sonnet Supported
Claude 4.5 Haiku
Built-in Reasoning Includes a reasoning mode that allows the model to work through complex problems step by step before producing a final answer.
Claude 4.6 Sonnet
Claude 4.5 Haiku Supported
Coding Performance Delivers strong results on coding tasks, producing code generation and debugging outputs comparable to heavier models at lower cost and higher speed.
Claude 4.6 Sonnet
Claude 4.5 Haiku Supported
Computer Use Controls browsers and desktop software to navigate complex spreadsheets, fill multi-step web forms, and automate workflows that previously required human intervention.
Claude 4.6 Sonnet Supported
Claude 4.5 Haiku
Extended Output Generates up to 64,000 tokens in a single response, supporting long-form code generation, detailed reports, and multi-step outputs.
Claude 4.6 Sonnet
Claude 4.5 Haiku Supported
File
Claude 4.6 Sonnet Supported
Claude 4.5 Haiku Supported
High Throughput Speed Optimized for low-latency responses, making it suitable for real-time applications such as live coding assistants and customer support bots.
Claude 4.6 Sonnet
Claude 4.5 Haiku Supported
Image
Claude 4.6 Sonnet Supported
Claude 4.5 Haiku Supported
Large Context Window Processes up to 200,000 tokens of input in a single request, enabling analysis of lengthy documents, large codebases, and extended conversations.
Claude 4.6 Sonnet
Claude 4.5 Haiku Supported
MCP Integration Compatible with Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers, enabling connection to external data sources and services through a standardized interface.
Claude 4.6 Sonnet Supported
Claude 4.5 Haiku
Multimodal Input Accepts text, images, and PDFs as input, allowing document analysis and vision-based tasks within the same model.
Claude 4.6 Sonnet
Claude 4.5 Haiku Supported
Reasoning Applies multi-step reasoning to complex professional tasks including financial analysis, research synthesis, and frontend code generation.
Claude 4.6 Sonnet Supported
Claude 4.5 Haiku Supported
Safety Guardrails Includes Anthropic's safety evaluations with documented resistance to prompt injection attacks, rated as safe as or safer than other recent Claude models.
Claude 4.6 Sonnet Supported
Claude 4.5 Haiku
Structured Output
Claude 4.6 Sonnet Supported
Claude 4.5 Haiku Supported
Text
Claude 4.6 Sonnet Supported
Claude 4.5 Haiku Supported
Tool Calling & Agents Supports tool calling and multi-step workflow automation, enabling integration into agentic pipelines that require external API calls or sequential reasoning.
Claude 4.6 Sonnet
Claude 4.5 Haiku Supported
Tool Use Supports structured tool calling, allowing the model to invoke external functions and APIs as part of a reasoning or task-completion workflow.
Claude 4.6 Sonnet Supported
Claude 4.5 Haiku
Tools
Claude 4.6 Sonnet Supported
Claude 4.5 Haiku Supported

Benchmark Comparison

Shared benchmark rows make it easier to compare performance where both models have published scores.

Benchmark Claude 4.6 Sonnet Claude 4.5 Haiku
ARC-AGI-2
Novel abstract reasoning and pattern recognition
Claude 4.6 Sonnet 58.3%
Claude 4.5 Haiku N/A
Finance Agent
Financial analysis and decision-making tasks
Claude 4.6 Sonnet 63.3%
Claude 4.5 Haiku N/A
GPQA Diamond
PhD-level science questions (biology, physics, chemistry)
Claude 4.6 Sonnet 79.9%
Claude 4.5 Haiku 64.6%
HLE
Questions that challenge frontier models across many domains
Claude 4.6 Sonnet 13.2%
Claude 4.5 Haiku 4.3%
IFBench
Instruction following accuracy
Claude 4.6 Sonnet 41.2%
Claude 4.5 Haiku N/A
LiveCodeBench
Real-world coding tasks from recent competitions
Claude 4.6 Sonnet N/A
Claude 4.5 Haiku 51.1%
Long Context Reasoning
Reasoning across long documents and contexts
Claude 4.6 Sonnet 57.7%
Claude 4.5 Haiku N/A
MATH-500
Undergraduate and competition-level math problems
Claude 4.6 Sonnet 97.8%
Claude 4.5 Haiku N/A
MCP-Atlas Tool Use
Structured tool use via Model Context Protocol
Claude 4.6 Sonnet 61.3%
Claude 4.5 Haiku N/A
MMLU-Pro
Expert knowledge across 14 academic disciplines
Claude 4.6 Sonnet 79.1%
Claude 4.5 Haiku 80.0%
MMMB
Multilingual and multimodal understanding
Claude 4.6 Sonnet 76.1%
Claude 4.5 Haiku N/A
OSWorld-Verified
Autonomous computer use and desktop tasks
Claude 4.6 Sonnet 72.5%
Claude 4.5 Haiku N/A
SciCode
Scientific research coding and numerical methods
Claude 4.6 Sonnet 46.9%
Claude 4.5 Haiku 34.4%
SWE-bench Verified
Real GitHub issues requiring multi-file code fixes
Claude 4.6 Sonnet 79.6%
Claude 4.5 Haiku N/A
Terminal-Bench 2.0
Agentic coding and terminal command tasks
Claude 4.6 Sonnet 59.1%
Claude 4.5 Haiku N/A
TerminalBench Hard
Agentic coding and terminal command tasks
Claude 4.6 Sonnet 46.2%
Claude 4.5 Haiku N/A
τ²-Bench
Agentic tool use in realistic scenarios
Claude 4.6 Sonnet 79.5%
Claude 4.5 Haiku N/A
τ²-bench Retail
Agentic tool use in retail scenarios
Claude 4.6 Sonnet 91.7%
Claude 4.5 Haiku N/A
τ²-bench Telecom
Agentic tool use in telecom scenarios
Claude 4.6 Sonnet 97.9%
Claude 4.5 Haiku N/A
Community discussion

What Reddit discussions say about Claude 4.6 Sonnet vs Claude 4.5 Haiku

Claude 4.6 Sonnet and Claude 4.5 Haiku are both surfacing live Reddit discussions, giving this comparison a community layer beyond specs and benchmarks.

The most visible threads right now are clustered in r/SillyTavernAI, r/perplexity_ai, r/DeepSeek.

Claude 4.5 Haiku r/perplexity_ai 1,237 upvotes 288 comments November 5, 2025
Perplexity is DELIBERATELY SCAMMING AND REROUTING users to other models

As you can see in the graph above, while in October, the use of Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking was normal, since the 1st of November, Perplexity has deliberately rerouted most if not ALL Sonnet 4.5 and 4.5 Thinking messages to far worse quality models like Gemini 2 Flash and, interestingly, Claude 4.5 Haiku Thinking which are probably cheaper models.

Perplexity is essentially SCAMMING subscribers by marketing their model as "Sonnet 4.5 Thinking" but then having all prompts given by a different model--still a Claude one so we don't realise!

Very scummy.

Open Reddit thread
Claude 4.6 Sonnet r/DeepSeek 113 upvotes 40 comments April 29, 2026
Deepseek V4 pro reminds me of Claude 4.6 sonnet

Honestly, it isn't a terrible model.

I would put it on par with maybe Claude 4.6 sonnet.

For creativity, as I usually need that for writing. Its pretty excellent. Just not the feeling of a model like opus would.

I don't really use any other model except Kimi K2.6, as that's the best one so far.

For coding, it's pretty good too, though I've only done some html stuff with it.

And the fact it's in preview, just only means there's a hole lot more this model can do! Once it gets better at roleplay (still a bit generic, better than deepseek V3.2 in some way imo). It would be my daily driver most definitely.

Open Reddit thread
Claude 4.6 Sonnet r/SillyTavernAI 91 upvotes 40 comments February 17, 2026
Claude Sonnet 4.6 is out

[https://openrouter.ai/anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6](https://openrouter.ai/anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6)

Same price as Sonnet 4.5

Open Reddit thread

Anthropic just dropped Haiku 4.5 and the numbers are wild:

**Performance:**

* 73.3% on SWE-bench Verified (matches Sonnet 4 from 5 months ago)
* 90% of Sonnet 4.5's agentic coding performance
* 2x faster than Sonnet 4
* 4-5x faster than Sonnet 4.5

**Pricing:**

* $1 input / $5 output per million tokens
* That's 66% cheaper than Sonnet 4 ($3/$15)
* \~10x cheaper than Sonnet 4.5 for 90% of the performance

**Why this matters:**

Multi-agent systems are now economically viable. Before Haiku 4.5:

* 10 agents × $15/million = $150/million (too expensive)
* 10 agents × 10s latency = 100s total (too slow)

With Haiku 4.5:

* 10 agents × $5/million = $50/million (3x cheaper)
* 10 agents × 2s latency = 20s total (5x faster)

**Use cases unlocked:**

* Real-time chat assistants (2s response time)
* Automated code reviews (\~$0.01 per review)
* Pair programming with Claude Code (no latency friction)
* Rapid prototyping (iterate as much as you want)

**Available now:**

* Claude.ai
* Claude Code (CLI + extension) - use `/model` command
* API: `model="claude-haiku-4.5-20251015"`
* AWS Bedrock
* Google Cloud Vertex AI

We wrote a deep-dive article (in French, but code examples and benchmarks are universal) with cost analysis, migration guides, and real scenarios: [here](https://cc-france.org/blog/claude-haiku-45-le-modle-qui-redfinit-le-rapport-p)

The barrier between "proof of concept" and "production" just got dramatically lower.

What are you planning to build with it?

Open Reddit thread
Claude 4.5 Haiku r/windsurf 66 upvotes 15 comments March 11, 2026
PSA: Windsurf has free Claude 4.5 Haiku, Sonnet, Opus; GPT 5-1

Press CTRL+I to invoke Windsurf Command ([documentation)](https://docs.windsurf.com/command/windsurf-overview): this generates code at your cursor, or it edits blocks of text. It never uses any credits.

Also, GPT 5.1 Codex and 5.1 Codex Mini are free in Cascade / chat ([documentation](https://docs.windsurf.com/windsurf/models)).

Open Reddit thread

Anthropic just dropped Haiku 4.5 and the numbers are wild:

**Performance:**

* 73.3% on SWE-bench Verified (matches Sonnet 4 from 5 months ago)
* 90% of Sonnet 4.5's agentic coding performance
* 2x faster than Sonnet 4
* 4-5x faster than Sonnet 4.5

**Pricing:**

* $1 input / $5 output per million tokens
* That's 66% cheaper than Sonnet 4 ($3/$15)
* \~10x cheaper than Sonnet 4.5 for 90% of the performance

**Why this matters:**

Multi-agent systems are now economically viable. Before Haiku 4.5:

* 10 agents × $15/million = $150/million (too expensive)
* 10 agents × 10s latency = 100s total (too slow)

With Haiku 4.5:

* 10 agents × $5/million = $50/million (3x cheaper)
* 10 agents × 2s latency = 20s total (5x faster)

**Use cases unlocked:**

* Real-time chat assistants (2s response time)
* Automated code reviews (\~$0.01 per review)
* Pair programming with Claude Code (no latency friction)
* Rapid prototyping (iterate as much as you want)

**Available now:**

* [Claude.ai](http://Claude.ai)
* Claude Code (CLI + extension) - use `/model` command
* API: `model="claude-haiku-4.5-20251015"`
* AWS Bedrock
* Google Cloud Vertex AI

We wrote a deep-dive article (in French, but code examples and benchmarks are universal) with cost analysis, migration guides, and real scenarios: [here](https://cc-france.org/blog/claude-haiku-45-le-modle-qui-redfinit-le-rapport-p)

The barrier between "proof of concept" and "production" just got dramatically lower.

What are you planning to build with it?

Open Reddit thread
View more discussions →

Which model should you choose?

Use the summary below to decide which model better fits your workflow, budget, and feature requirements.

Best fit for

Claude 4.6 Sonnet

Claude 4.6 Sonnet is a stronger fit for long-context workloads, reasoning-heavy tasks, tool-augmented workflows.

Best fit for

Claude 4.5 Haiku

Claude 4.5 Haiku is a stronger fit for reasoning-heavy tasks, tool-augmented workflows, multimodal applications.

Verdict

Choose Claude 4.6 Sonnet if you prioritize long-context workloads, reasoning-heavy tasks, tool-augmented workflows. Choose Claude 4.5 Haiku if your workflow depends more on reasoning-heavy tasks, tool-augmented workflows, multimodal applications.

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 4.6 Sonnet vs Claude 4.5 Haiku

What is the main difference between Claude 4.6 Sonnet and Claude 4.5 Haiku?

Claude 4.6 Sonnet leans toward long-context workloads, reasoning-heavy tasks, tool-augmented workflows, while Claude 4.5 Haiku is better suited to reasoning-heavy tasks, tool-augmented workflows, multimodal applications.

Which model is cheaper: Claude 4.6 Sonnet or Claude 4.5 Haiku?

Claude 4.5 Haiku starts lower on input pricing at $1.0000 per 1M input tokens, compared with $3.0000 for Claude 4.6 Sonnet.

Which model has the larger context window: Claude 4.6 Sonnet or Claude 4.5 Haiku?

Claude 4.6 Sonnet is listed with a context window of 1M, while Claude 4.5 Haiku is listed with 200,000.

How should I evaluate Claude 4.6 Sonnet vs Claude 4.5 Haiku for my use case?

This comparison currently includes 19 shared benchmark rows, helping you compare practical performance across overlapping evaluations.