Mistral vs Mistral

Mistral Medium 3 vs Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03)

Compare Mistral Medium 3 and Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03) across pricing, context window, capabilities, benchmarks, and API access to choose the better fit for tool-augmented workflows versus cost-efficient scale.

Overview Comparison

Structured side-by-side differences for the highest-signal model metadata.

Mistral Medium 3
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03)

Provider

The entity that currently provides this model.

Mistral Medium 3 Mistral
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03) Mistral

Model ID

The routed model identifier exposed by upstream providers.

Mistral Medium 3 mistralai/mistral-medium-3
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03) N/A

Input Context Window

The number of tokens supported by the input context window.

Mistral Medium 3 128,000 tokens
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03) 128,000 tokens

Maximum Output Tokens

The number of tokens that can be generated by the model in a single request.

Mistral Medium 3 16,000 tokens tokens
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03) 16,000 tokens tokens

Open Source

Whether the model's code is available for public use.

Mistral Medium 3 No
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03) No

Release Date

When the model was first released.

Mistral Medium 3 May 07, 2025
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03) Unknown

Knowledge Cut-off Date

When the model's knowledge was last updated.

Mistral Medium 3 2025
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03) Unknown

API Providers

The providers that currently expose the model through an API.

Mistral Medium 3
OpenRouter
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03)
Mistral API, Hugging Face

Modalities

Types of data each model can process or return.

Mistral Medium 3
Text Image File
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03)
Text Code

Pricing Comparison

Compare current token pricing before you choose the cheaper or more scalable API option.

Mistral Medium 3 Mistral
Input price $0.40 Per 1M tokens
Output price $2.00 Per 1M tokens
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03) Mistral
Input price $0.10 Per 1M tokens
Output price N/A Per 1M tokens

Capabilities Comparison

See where each model overlaps, where they differ, and which one supports more of the features you care about.

Capability
Mistral Medium 3
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03)
Code Generation Generates, explains, and debugs code across common programming languages, with coding identified as one of the model's primary strengths.
Mistral Medium 3 Supported
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03) Supported
Cost-Efficient Pricing Priced at $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens, positioning it as an accessible option for organizations managing AI inference costs.
Mistral Medium 3 Supported
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03)
Enterprise Deployment Can be deployed on any cloud environment or self-hosted on a minimum of four GPUs, with integration options for enterprise knowledge bases.
Mistral Medium 3 Supported
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03)
Fast Inference Delivers approximately 150 tokens per second, supporting latency-sensitive production workloads on a single node.
Mistral Medium 3
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03) Supported
File
Mistral Medium 3 Supported
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03)
Fine-Tuning Support Supports continuous pre-training and comprehensive fine-tuning, allowing organizations to adapt the model to domain-specific datasets and workflows.
Mistral Medium 3 Supported
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03)
Function Calling Supports structured tool use and function calling, enabling integration with external APIs and agentic workflows.
Mistral Medium 3
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03) Supported
Image
Mistral Medium 3 Supported
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03)
Long Context Window Processes up to 128,000 tokens in a single request, enabling analysis of long documents, codebases, or extended conversations without truncation.
Mistral Medium 3 Supported
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03) Supported
Multilingual Text Supports dozens of spoken languages for generation and comprehension tasks, making it suitable for international and localized applications.
Mistral Medium 3
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03) Supported
Multimodal Understanding Handles tasks requiring multimodal comprehension, supporting analysis that goes beyond plain text inputs as noted in the model's official overview.
Mistral Medium 3 Supported
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03) Supported
Structured Output
Mistral Medium 3 Supported
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03)
Text
Mistral Medium 3 Supported
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03) Supported
Tools
Mistral Medium 3 Supported
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03)

Benchmark Comparison

Shared benchmark rows make it easier to compare performance where both models have published scores.

Benchmark Mistral Medium 3 Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03)
AIME 2024
American math olympiad problems
Mistral Medium 3 44.0%
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03) 6.3%
GPQA Diamond
PhD-level science questions (biology, physics, chemistry)
Mistral Medium 3 57.8%
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03) 38.1%
HLE
Questions that challenge frontier models across many domains
Mistral Medium 3 4.3%
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03) 4.3%
LiveCodeBench
Real-world coding tasks from recent competitions
Mistral Medium 3 40.0%
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03) 14.1%
MATH-500
Undergraduate and competition-level math problems
Mistral Medium 3 90.7%
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03) 56.3%
MMLU-Pro
Expert knowledge across 14 academic disciplines
Mistral Medium 3 76.0%
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03) 52.9%
SciCode
Scientific research coding and numerical methods
Mistral Medium 3 33.1%
Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03) 15.6%
Community discussion

What Reddit discussions say about Mistral Medium 3 vs Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03)

Mistral Medium 3 and Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03) are both surfacing live Reddit discussions, giving this comparison a community layer beyond specs and benchmarks.

The most visible threads right now are clustered in r/MistralAI, r/LocalLLaMA, r/singularity.

Mistral Medium 3 r/ollama 906 upvotes 336 comments April 29, 2026
Setting up Ollama on dual RTX PRO 6000 Blackwells looking for tips

Hey all. Just set up a workstation with two NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwells (96GB VRAM each) for our design studio. Want to use Ollama as our main local inference layer.

**What we want to do with it:**

1. Internal copilot for a \~60 person team. research, writing, brief analysis, code assist
2. Backend for agentic tools we're building (API access is a big reason we picked Ollama)
3. Run the biggest, best models our hardware can handle

**Specific questions:**

* How well does Ollama handle dual GPU setups out of the box? Any config needed for tensor parallelism across both cards?
* What models would you recommend at this VRAM level? Thinking Llama 3.1 70B unquantized, maybe even 405B at Q4?
* Anyone serving Ollama to a team via Open WebUI or similar? How's the experience at 10-15 concurrent users?
* Any gotchas with large model loading times or memory management I should know about?

First time running Ollama beyond hobby experiments, so any production-ish tips are appreciated. Will report back with what works.

\------

UPDATE FOR OTHERS & THANKS FOR THE HELP . THIS SUB WASN'T AS SNARKY AND IN FACT A LOT MORE HELPFUL THAN THE OTHER ONE.

For context: we're a design agency rendering 3D animations, VR/AR walkthroughs, and architectural visualizations. Not generating AI images or running Stable Diffusion farms. The dual RTX Pro 6000s (96 GB VRAM each) are a dedicated render node that processes overnight animation batches and path-traced scenes while our design team stays productive on their own workstations. Cloud rendering costs add up absurdly fast at our project volume. Owning the hardware pays for itself in months. OctaneRender and Redshift scale linearly across both GPUs, which turns 12+ hour VR renders into something we can actually deliver on client deadlines.

# Key Technical Advice & Actionables

# Infrastructure Stack (Overwhelming Consensus)

**Switch from Ollama to vLLM or llama.cpp**

* **169 upvotes** on "Tip #1 don't use Ollama"
* **109 upvotes** on criticism of using Ollama with $25k hardware
* vLLM is the top recommendation for multi-user concurrency (your 10-15 concurrent users scenario)
* llama.cpp is acceptable for single-user or simpler setups, but vLLM wins for parallelization

**Use Linux instead of Windows**

* **266 upvotes** on "Tip #2 use Linux"
* Ubuntu LTS 24.04 most recommended for NVIDIA driver support
* Debian headless for maximum resource efficiency
* Debate exists: some claim Windows CUDA drivers are 2-3% faster for pure VRAM inference, but Linux wins for stability and virtual memory handling

# Model Recommendations

**Stop using Llama 3.1 70B** (described as "ancient" and "severely outdated")

* **Minimax M2.7 (230B MoE, 10B active)** with NVFP4 quantization — perfect fit for your dual 96GB setup
* **Qwen 3.5/3.6 series** (27B, 35B MoE, 122B) — excellent dense models, great for agentic tasks
* **Gemma 4** — recommended if you need "western" models (some companies ban Chinese models)
* **Mistral Medium 3.5 (119B MoE)** or new **Mistral 128B dense** — good for massive context windows

# Critical Configuration Settings

**Use Tensor Parallelism (tp=2)**

* Splits model across both GPUs for unified inference
* Doubles speed and allows models up to \~180-190GB total
* Essential command: `--tp 2` in vLLM or llama.cpp

**Use NVFP4 Quantization**

* Hardware-accelerated 4-bit format specifically for Blackwell architecture
* Minimax M2.7 NVFP4 fits in 130.6GB (down from 230GB)
* Multiple users emphasized this is purpose-built for your cards

**Optimize for Concurrency**

* Use **litellm** as a model router in front of vLLM for rate limiting and monitoring
* Set `--gpu-memory-utilization 0.9` or higher to maximize KV cache
* **SGLang** recommended over vLLM if team works on same projects (prefix caching with RadixAttention)
* For 60-person team: expect 5-8 simultaneous users per card on 70B Q4 before throughput drops

# System Architecture

**Cooling & Power Management**

* GPU spacing: minimum 2 slots apart for adequate airflow
* Consider power limiting cards to reduce heat and increase stability
* Script fixed clock times (10MHz below stock) to prevent PCIe bus spikes
* Heat management is critical for sustained inference loads

**RAM Requirements**

* Minimum 256GB system RAM
* Recommendation: **2× VRAM = 384-512GB system RAM** for optimal performance
* Essential for virtual memory handling during large context operations

**Frontend & User Access**

* **Open WebUI** is acceptable for team deployment (contrary to one dismissive comment)
* Alternative: Set up **litellm** for monitoring, rate limiting, API key generation
* Some debate about OpenWebUI in 2026, but no clear superior alternative mentioned for your use case

# Specific Guides & Resources Mentioned

1. **vLLM Blackwell guide**: [https://github.com/lastloop-ai/vllm-blackwell-guide](https://github.com/lastloop-ai/vllm-blackwell-guide) (120+ t/s on Qwen 27B, 200+ t/s on 35B MoE)
2. **Ollama agent configs**: [https://github.com/caliber-ai-org/ai-setup](https://github.com/caliber-ai-org/ai-setup) (888 stars, production patterns for team deployment)
3. **llama-swap** tool for dynamic model switching without container restarts

# Hiring & Operational Advice

**Top upvoted wisdom** (113+ votes on original thread you referenced): "Storage, model management, permissions, and user access become more important than the GPUs after week one. Hire someone experienced with this stack."

Open Reddit thread
Mistral Medium 3 r/LocalLLaMA 544 upvotes 315 comments April 29, 2026
mistralai/Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B · Hugging Face

[https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B-GGUF](https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B-GGUF)

# Mistral Medium 3.5 128B

Mistral Medium 3.5 is our first flagship merged model. It is a dense 128B model with a 256k context window, handling instruction-following, reasoning, and coding in a single set of weights. Mistral Medium 3.5 replaces its predecessor Mistral Medium 3.1 and Magistral in Le Chat. It also replaces Devstral 2 in our coding agent Vibe. Concretely, expect better performance for instruct, reasoning and coding tasks in a new unified model in comparison with our previous released models.

Reasoning effort is configurable per request, so the same model can answer a quick chat reply or work through a complex agentic run. We trained the vision encoder from scratch to handle variable image sizes and aspect ratios.

Find more information on our [blog](https://mistral.ai/news/vibe-remote-agents-mistral-medium-3-5).

# Key Features

Mistral Medium 3.5 includes the following architectural choices:

* **Dense 128B parameters**.
* **256k context length**.
* **Multimodal input**: Accepts both text and image input, with text output.
* **Instruct and Reasoning functionalities** with function calls (reasoning effort configurable per request).

Mistral Medium 3.5 offers the following capabilities:

* **Reasoning Mode**: Toggle between fast instant reply mode and reasoning mode, boosting performance with test-time compute when requested.
* **Vision**: Analyzes images and provides insights based on visual content, in addition to text.
* **Multilingual**: Supports dozens of languages, including English, French, Spanish, German, Italian, Portuguese, Dutch, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Arabic.
* **System Prompt**: Strong adherence and support for system prompts.
* **Agentic**: Best-in-class agentic capabilities with native function calling and JSON output.
* **Large Context Window**: Supports a 256k context window.

We release this model under a [**Modified MIT License**](https://huggingface.co/mistralai/Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B/blob/main/(https://huggingface.co/mistralai/mistralai/Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B/blob/main/LICENSE)): Open-source license for both commercial and non-commercial use with exceptions for companies with large revenue.

# Recommended Settings

* **Reasoning Effort**:
* `'none'` → Do not use reasoning
* `'high'` → Use reasoning (recommended for complex prompts and agentic usage) Use `reasoning_effort="high"` for complex tasks and agentic coding.
* **Temperature**: 0.7 for `reasoning_effort="high"`. Temp between 0.0 and 0.7 for `reasoning_effort="none"` depending on the task. Generally, lower means answer that are more to the point and higher allows the model to be more creative. It is a good practice to try different values in order to improve the model performance to meet your demands.

Open Reddit thread
Mistral Medium 3 r/unsloth 433 upvotes 81 comments April 29, 2026
Mistral 3.5 out now!

Mistral releases Mistral Medium 3.5, a new vision reasoning model. 🔥

Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B offers highly competitive performance for models 5x its size.

Hey guys, we worked with Mistral to fix Mistral Medium 3.5 inference affecting some implementations, and released updated GGUFs with the fix (NOT related to Unsloth or quants). Mistral 3.5 now works properly in transformers AND llama.cpp.

The issue was caused by a YaRN parsing quirk affecting some implementations. Changing mscale\_all\_dim from 1 to 0 resolved it. We also fixed mmproj files generation.

Mistral has pushed our fixes to their official repo. The YaRN scaling multiplier is applied correctly, fixing forgetting previous conversations.

Guide: [https://unsloth.ai/docs/models/mistral-3.5](https://unsloth.ai/docs/models/mistral-3.5)

GGUFs: [https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B-GGUF](https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B-GGUF)

Open Reddit thread
View more discussions →

AI tools related to Mistral Medium 3 vs Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03)

These tools are closely connected to one or both models in this comparison and can help you evaluate real-world fit.

AI Chatbot

Mistral 7B

Mistral 7B is a high-performance large language model (LLM) developed by Mistral AI, engineered for versatility across diverse applications. It surpasses Llama 2 13B in benchmark performance, offering native coding capabilities and an 8k sequence length. A wide range of fine-tuned versions exists, specialized for tasks such as scientific reasoning, role-playing, and niche knowledge domains.

Free 0 visits 2 saves
AI Chatbot

LongShot AI

LongShot AI is an AI-powered content creation platform built to help users plan, generate, and optimize articles for search engines like Google, ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini. It provides features such as real-time content generation, fact-checking, semantic SEO, and custom AI tools to produce high-quality, SEO-optimized content. LongShot AI balances creativity with optimization to help users create content that engages audiences and improves search rankings.

Free 0 visits 30 saves
AI Chatbot

Continue

Continue is an open-source AI coding assistant designed for deep customization and continuous learning from your development data. As a VS Code extension, it integrates AI capabilities directly into your IDE, allowing you to connect various models and context sources to create personalized autocomplete and chat workflows.

Free 655 visits 8 saves
AI Assistant

AppFlowy

AppFlowy is an AI-powered, secure collaborative workspace built to help users manage projects, wikis, and teams while maintaining full control over their data. It offers optional end-to-end encryption (E2EE) and supports hybrid local or cloud deployment. As an AI-integrated workspace, it assists with tasks such as answering questions, refining writing, autofilling tables, and generating insights from databases.

Free 39 visits 6 saves

Which model should you choose?

Use the summary below to decide which model better fits your workflow, budget, and feature requirements.

Best fit for

Mistral Medium 3

Mistral Medium 3 is a stronger fit for tool-augmented workflows, multimodal applications, cost-efficient scale.

Best fit for

Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03)

Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03) is a stronger fit for cost-efficient scale, benchmark-led evaluation.

Verdict

Choose Mistral Medium 3 if you prioritize tool-augmented workflows, multimodal applications, cost-efficient scale. Choose Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03) if your workflow depends more on cost-efficient scale, benchmark-led evaluation.

FAQ

Common questions about Mistral Medium 3 vs Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03)

What is the main difference between Mistral Medium 3 and Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03)?

Mistral Medium 3 leans toward tool-augmented workflows, multimodal applications, cost-efficient scale, while Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03) is better suited to cost-efficient scale, benchmark-led evaluation.

Which model is cheaper: Mistral Medium 3 or Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03)?

Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03) starts lower on input pricing at $0.1000 per 1M input tokens, compared with $0.4000 for Mistral Medium 3.

Which model has the larger context window: Mistral Medium 3 or Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03)?

Mistral Medium 3 is listed with a context window of 128,000, while Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03) is listed with 128,000.

How should I evaluate Mistral Medium 3 vs Mistral Small 3.1 (25.03) for my use case?

This comparison currently includes 7 shared benchmark rows, helping you compare practical performance across overlapping evaluations.